Talk:Stat Growths/@comment-206.188.88.75-20130821143238/@comment-4613046-20130822134353

I'm all for playing different vocations, hell the game encourages you to play different vocations to get a better experience. As Callipygias said: "If that's how they enjoy playing then that's how they should play." And I agree. DD:DA makes it really difficult to F-up your character. I can't stand playing Sorcerer, let alone playing it until 200 but if I come close to leveling then I'll head over and switch my vocation to get that extra 2 Magick Attack because it adds up.

My gripe is the: "If you want to build a good magic archer just play as a magic archer, you get stats that are balanced for the vocation you are playing anyways." statement. You clearly understand stat growth for different vocations and yet you believe that Magick Archer has a "balanced" stat growth?

Assuming you start as a Strider at level 1 - 10 then Magick Archer until 200. That nets you a total of 467 Base Magick Attack

Then lets look at starting as a Strider at level 1 - 10 then Sorcerer until 200. That nets you a total of 847 Base Magick Attack. You've basically doubled your stat.

I'm done ranting, I'm not here to argue. To each their own, but you can't disagree with the math.