Talk:Dragon's Dogma World and Lore/@comment-47.20.21.200-20160131022818/@comment-24.16.237.1-20170310081603

you got a good eye but you overthought it. So lets say only 3 dragons have been known right? Also, it is possible that the 2nd and 3rd are the same. Follow? Then arisen you play as kills the third right? So, then it is speculated and widley agreed upon that Godking Leonart slayed the first yes? As well as savan making the slaying of the second. But then what the heck?! What about Sofiah's dragon? That would mean an ovbious (at least) 4, quatro, dragons right? This is where im glad you mentioned Dark Arisen. As convoluded as DA is, it is still canon. So when we come to the second battle with Daemon, we realize something is a little off due to his talking stomach... Heres where it makes sense... it doesnt. Dark Arisen is the plot-hole filler of the century. And I quote "The cycle is a lie", meaning that not exactly everything is explained nor makes sense(adds up). Skip ahead to 2015 where now we have Dragons Dogma: Online. So assssumeing capcom delivers, more will be explained and the plot holes should be filled. I realize this doesnt progress our understanding of the DD world but thats in time. With all this said your still correct in you're logic you just always got to consider the out of left field story that is Dark Arisen making light to the multiple existances in this games universe(s).