Talk:Mage/@comment-92.30.126.45-20120603103154/@comment-84.179.89.217-20120603130530

Don't be so arrogant, just because it's best for you, doesn't mean it's best for everyone. I personally would choose Mage over Sorcerer anyday. Why?

My Party is as following: I'm a strider, my main pawn a Mage, and I have 2 Fighters, probably much different than your Party, right? And I never had that much Problems with most enemies, not even the Evil Eye, which was actually quite easy, as are Golems, even without a sorcerer! Honestly, Both are really easy to defeat. Again, I didn't had any sorcerer, and was far from being screwed.

In my New Game +, I recently tried having my main pawn becoming a sorcerer, but it just didn't worked, so I quickly changed back. I just miss my healer sooo much. He's less of a damage dealer, and more of a supporter. And, as said, it works perfect.

So stop thinking you know all better. It's embarassing.