Talk:Warrior/@comment-3220518-20130618193358/@comment-66.87.119.142-20130806040139

Honestly. Did you read the comment? Warrior, unless in combat with a slow moving boss can not hold Arggo as good as fighter for one reason only. Speed. Warriors naturally move slower, as the game describe. This hindrance is due to their massive weapon. Tell me have you ever seen a warrior headed for battle? If you have any observational skills you would clearly see them slothfully moving towards the enemy, at a slower rate than fighter. Now you complained about defensive skills. Exactly did you read what I said about no shield skills? Your pawn will simply use it to block and deflect if you have the skill. Dragons maw has a hit radius on par with corona, however elliptic does reach a little further due to shockwave. Dragons maw hits faster and harder, it can stun lock, etc. Now, lets face it fighter has atleast 200% survive ability rate than warrior for this reason, better defense growth, and being able to block just about all physical attacks, perfect blocking also causes knock back and damage with reflect. A warrior sadly has to jump out the way, assuming he is not hit and then re engage consuming time. Over all fighter is better at holding Arggo without the shield drum/ war cry skill enabled.